USPTO serial 76479554
BODY BY GOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BODY BY GOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kissimmee, FL
Kissimmee, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence H. Haber
LAWRENCE H HABER LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE H HABER PA800 CELEBRATION AVE STE 227CELEBRATION, FL 34747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Wrist, hand-held, and ankle weights and waistband belt weights for exercise; exercise equipment, namely, manually operated jogging machines, rowing machines, stair-stepping machines, and stationary cycles; manually-operated exercise equipment, namely abdominal boards, chest expanders, chest pulls, exercise equipment for lateral movement in a skating motion; manually-operated exercise equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Snack mixes consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; potato chips, vegetable-based chips, natural vegetable-based sandwich spreads | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Tea; processed cereals; cookies; spices; salad dressings and marinades, and spices used to make these; condiments, namely, mayonnaise, mustard and ketchup; snack mixes consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit juices and bottled water, namely spring water and mineral water | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LERNER, BEN
- Other trademarks owned by LERNER, BEN
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named BODY BY GOD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |