Drawing for GARDEN PATH

USPTO serial 76485001

GARDEN PATH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GARDEN PATH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Fred W. Hathaway

FRED W HATHAWAY BUCHANAN INGERSOLL PCPO BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031LIVE PLANTS, NAMELY ROSESACTIVEJan 3, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 12, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2006IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Jul 12, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 22, 2006AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 7, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jun 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 7, 2006EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 14, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 31, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Feb 22, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 20, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Feb 12, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance