USPTO serial 76487148
MANGIA!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MANGIA!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Canned Goods, Namely Canned Tomatoes, Excluding Canned Goods Distributed And Sold To The Retail Market Segment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 3, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |