USPTO serial 76507967
INNERGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INNERGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donn K. Harms
DONN K HARMS AMERICAN PATENT & TRADEMARK LAW CENTER12702 VIA CORTINA, STE 100DEL MAR, CA 92014UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Musical sound recordings; audio-visual recordings, namely, compact discs, videotape cassettes, audio cassettes, audio tapes, audio discs, phonograph records, CD-ROMs, video tapes, video cassettes, video discs, DVDs, DATs, MP3s, and laser discs, all featuring music and entertainment; downloadable musical sound recordings; downloadable video recordings featuring music entertainment, arts, fashion, lifestyles, culture and politics; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books, booklets, magazines, journals, manuals, brochures, leaflets, pamphlets and newsletters, all in the field of music, entertainment, arts, fashion, lifestyles, culture and politics; electronic publications, namely, books, booklets, magazines, journals, manuals, brochures, leaflets, pamphlets and newsletters, all in the field of music, entertainment, arts, fashion, lifestyles, culture and politics recorded on CD-ROMs, diskettes, floppy disks, video cassettes, and magnetic tapes; computer software for the purpose of entertainment and education, namely, instructing users on the history and trends in the entertainment, arts, fashion, music and music video industries; computer software for the purpose of entertainment and education, namely, instructing users on the history and trends in the entertainment , arts, fashion, music and music video industries that may be downloaded from the global computer network; magnets; decorative magnets; refrigerator magnets; novelty magnets; mouse pads; compact disc cases; fitted cases for storage and transportation, namely, cases for compact discs, audio cassettes, video cassettes, CD-ROMs, home video games, home video game accessories, computers, computer accessories, cameras, camcorders and portable phones; computer carrying cases; wrist rests and supports for computer mouse users; wrist rests for computer products; computer keyboard wrist pads; protective eyewear; sunglasses; eyeglasses; eyeglass frames; eyeglass, sunglass and spectacle cases; eyeglass, sunglass and spectacle straps; eyeglass, sunglass and spectacle chains; eyeglass, sunglass and spectacle cleaning cloths | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |