Drawing for FLIRT

USPTO serial 76518604

FLIRT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3064097Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 28, 2006
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLIRT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Wells IP Law299 S. Main St., Suite 1300Salt Lake City, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033VODKASECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2013C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Nov 4, 2013CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 22, 2013CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Jun 29, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 29, 2012PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 24, 2011NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 20118.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Sep 24, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 23, 2011ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 18, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 10, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Dec 31, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 31, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 6, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 21, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance