Drawing for META MATRIX

USPTO serial 76532965

META MATRIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with META MATRIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan A. LaVine

JORDAN A LAVINE AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD, LLPONE COMMERCE SQ2005 MARKET ST STE 2200PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business consulting services in the nature of certification and training services for improving interpersonal and business relationshipsACTIVEAug 6, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2004MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 2, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 2, 2004EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2004CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance