USPTO serial 76565673
EARPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EARPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Burlington, Ontario L7R 3Y3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robyn S. Lederman
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HEARING INSTRUMENTS AND COMPONENTS, NAMELY INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND CHIPS; HEARING AIDS; HEADSETS, NAMELY CELLULAR PHONE HEADSETS, CORDLESS HEADSETS, HEADSETS FOR TELEPHONES AND HEADSETS FOR USE WITH COMPUTERS; HEADPHONES; EARPHONES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | CUSTOM DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, COMPONENTS, DEVICES, ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES, HEARING AIDS AND CUSTOM DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH FIDELITY DIGITAL AND AUDIO TECHNOLOGY FOR HEARING INSTRUMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |