Drawing for FUTUREPATH

USPTO serial 76566237

FUTUREPATH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FUTUREPATH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew D. Price

ANDREW D PRICE VENABLE LLP575 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing services in the investment and financial field, namely investment brokerage, investment management, asset management, investment advice, investment consultation, financial research, banking, college savings plans, retirement planning, and variable annuities investment; and providing electronic services via the Internet in the investment and financial field, namely, administration of employee benefit plans, mutual fund investment, investment brokerage, investment management, asset management, investment advice, investment consultation, financial research, banking, college savings plans, retirement planning, financial calculators and analyzers, and variable annuities investmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 23, 2005ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 12, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 12, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jan 10, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance