USPTO serial 76566784
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Briarcliff Manor, NY
Briarcliff Manor, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul E. Fahrenkopf
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |