Drawing for QUICK BREW

USPTO serial 76573956

QUICK BREW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUICK BREW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Harrison

MARK HARRISON VENABLEPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Manual coffeemakers, namely non-electric coffeemakersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 14, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 29, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 22, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 21, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance