USPTO serial 76574646
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lyman F. Spitzer
LYMAN F SPITZER SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK LLP1000 JACKSONTOLEDO, OH 43624-1573UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | batteries; solid-state electrolyte batteries; battery powered magnetically or microchip encodeable credit cards, debit cards, identification cards, conditional access cards and other electrical powered magnetically or microchip encodeable smart cards, tags and fobs, sold either unencoded or partially encoded; and component cores of battery powered magnetically or microchip encodeable credit cards, debit cards, identification cards, conditional access cards and other electrical powered magnetically or microchip encodeable smart cards, tags and fobs for encoding or completion of encoding and application of printed overlays by the customer | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |