Drawing for Serial No. 76577156

USPTO serial 76577156

Serial No. 76577156

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76577156?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard T. Lyon

RICHARD T LYON LYON & HARR LLP300 ESPLANADE DR STE 800OXNARD, CA 93036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Bellowed drain plungers for use with drains such as found in toilets, sinks and tubsACTIVEDec 1, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 2, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 2, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 18, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 7, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 4, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 6, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 5, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 30, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance