USPTO serial 76596704
SLEEP SWEETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, ANDREA P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SLEEP SWEETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Pedro, CA
San Pedro, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine J. Holland
Catherine J. Holland KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | candy, candy bars, candy mints, candy made of carob, flavored sweetened gelatin desserts, flavored sweetened pudding desserts, bakery desserts, cake mixes, pastries, tarts, pies, cookies, chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies, custardbased fillings for cakes and pies, cocoa, cocoa mixes, chocolate, chocolate mousse, chocolate syrup, chocolate topping, chocolate based ready to eat food bars, hot chocolate, chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based, ice cream, ice cream drinks, ice cream substitute, cones for ice cream, frozen yogurt, tea based beverages with fruit flavoring, herbal food beverages with fruit flavoring, caramel popcorn and food package combinations consisting primarily of cookies, cakes and/or pies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 24, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |