Drawing for ATTENTION IS THE KEY TO PREVENTION

USPTO serial 76597383

ATTENTION IS THE KEY TO PREVENTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATTENTION IS THE KEY TO PREVENTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristin K. Manley

KRISTIN K MANLEY DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP401 B ST STE 1700SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4297UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Non-precious metal children's bracelets to deter and prevent child abductionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 22, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 21, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 1, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 1, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 22, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 27, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 24, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 21, 2005CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 19, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance