Drawing for Serial No. 76601697

USPTO serial 76601697

Serial No. 76601697

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLAIR, JASON
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76601697?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

K. DANICA RAY

K. DANICA RAY DLA PIPER US LLP401 B STREET, SUITE 1700SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4297UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Personal security alarm in the nature of a child's bracelet to deter and prevent child abductionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 29, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 29, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 13, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 9, 2008GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2008GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2008CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN—
Aug 20, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 19, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 19, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 15, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2008GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 24, 2008GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2008CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Jun 17, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 16, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 16, 2008CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 18, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 18, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 18, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2006PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Dec 12, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 15, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 18, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 28, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance