USPTO serial 76603207
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David T. Bracken
DAVID T BRACKEN THE LAW OFFICE OF DAVID T BRACKEN4839 BOND AVEORANGE, CA 92869-2734UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics and skin care products, namely, bath oil, hair shampoo, and conditioner, non-medicated lip balm with sun screen; nonmedicated hair care preparations; hair styling gel and mousse; hair color; facial masks; skin, body and facial cleansers, creams, gels and scrubs; body therapy oils; nonmedicated bath salts; face and body moisturizing sprays; bath and body powder; nail care preparations; hand and foot creams, gels and scrubs; suntan and tan block gels; eye makeup; lipstick; lip liner; lip primer; eye creams and gels; eye makeup; eye shadow; personal deodorant; after-shave lotions; shaving preparations; shaving creams, foams, gels and lotions; and essential oils for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |