CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for REACTING TO THE PAST

USPTO serial 76603640

REACTING TO THE PAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REACTING TO THE PAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary M. Luria

MARY M LURIA DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BROADWAY FL 3NEW YORK, NY 10019-4379UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of newsletters, and educational computer software featuring instruction, education and teaching for teachers and students at the college level and postgraduate level, both in the field of game-based educational methods as applied in teaching history, religion, philosophy, government and scienceACTIVE—
028HANDHELD UNIT FOR PLAYING VIDEO GAMES; HANDHELD VIDEO GAME SYSTEMS, COMPRISING HANDHELD UNITS FOR PLAYING VIDEO GAMES AND ASSOCIATED GAME CARTRIDGES SOLD AS A UNIT; MANIPULATIVE PUZZLES; BOARD GAMESACTIVE—
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ONLINE NEWSLETTERS, CLASSES, SEMINARS, CONFERENCES AND WORKSHOPS FOR TEACHERS AND STUDENTS AT THE COLLEGE LEVEL AND POST-GRADUATE LEVEL IN GAME-BASED EDUCATIONAL METHODS IN THE FIELDS OF HISTORY, RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY, GOVERNMENT AND SCIENCEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 20, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 16, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 4, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 1, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance