USPTO serial 76605496
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
City of Industry, CA
City of Industry, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam Fox
Jada Toys, Inc.938 Hatcher Ave.City of Industry, CA 91748UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toy action figures and accessories for use therewith, die cast toy cars, toy trucks, and toy vehicles, radio-controlled toy vehicles, friction toy vehicles, wind-up toy vehicles, dolls, doll clothing and doll accessories, children's and infants multiple activity toys, plush toys, stuffed toys, plastic and vinyl toy characters and toy animals, ride-on toys, wind-up toys, battery-operated toy vehicles, push toys, pull toys, mechanical toys, toy construction sets, building toys, water squirting toys, musical toys, inflatable toys, infant toy rattles, jigsaw puzzles, skateboards, toy scooters, surfboards, snowboards, body boards, longboards, shortboards, windsurf boards, wakeboards, sailboards, toy sporting equipment, namely, footballs, baseballs, soccer balls, baseball bats, golf clubs, hockey sticks and pucks, basketballs, volleyballs, golf balls, foam disc and ball shooters and foam toy discs and balls for use therewith | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 26, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |