USPTO serial 76605681
SKIN FOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKIN FOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morland C. Fischer
Morland C. Fischer LAW OFFICES OF MORLAND C FISCHER2030 MAIN ST STE 1300IRVINE, CA 92614-7254UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Bottled water and other beverages fortified with vitamins and minerals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |