USPTO serial 76616181
MICHAEL MONDAVI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICHAEL MONDAVI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Oakville, CA
Oakville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas R. Lampe
PETER M BRODY ROPES & GRAY LLPONE METRO CENTER700 12TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3948Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |