USPTO serial 76618018
WE SQUEEZE THE CRAP OUT OF WATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 24, 2008
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with WE SQUEEZE THE CRAP OUT OF WATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcus P. Dolce
Marcus P. Dolce FLYNN, THIEL, BOUTELL & TANIS, P.C.2026 Rambling RdKalamazoo, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MANUFACTURING MACHINERY, NAMELY, LIQUID EXTRACTION MACHINES | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2004 |
| 025 | T-SHIRTS | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2004 |
| 037 | LIQUID EXTRACTION MACHINE INSTALLATION SERVICES | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2004 |
| 040 | LIQUID EXTRACTION SERVICES, NAMELY, THE SERVICE OF REMOVING LIQUID FROM A MASS HAVING A LIQUID COMPONENT AND A SOLID COMPONENT | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Prime Solution, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Prime Solution, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Prime Solution, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named WE SQUEEZE THE CRAP OUT OF WATER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 23, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 23, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 22, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |