USPTO serial 76619249
MEDIGUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEDIGUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin D. McCarthy
KEVIN D. MCCARTHY ROACH BROWN MCCARTHY & GRUBER, P.C.1920 LIBERTY BUILDING -- 424 MAIN STREETBUFFALO, NY 14202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific, photographic and optical apparatus and instruments, namely, flexible, semi-flexible and rigid endoscopes, cameras and video cameras for use in industrial endoscopes, vertebrae for distal tips of flexible endoscopes and back-office units for endoscopy namely pumps for insufflation and suction, light source and ultrasound sight; computer programs and software for supporting the physician or technician performing the endoscopy procedure such as image processing software for the video camera, software for generating ultrasound sight and software for controlling the insufflation and irrigation pumps; computer hardware | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | Surgical, medical, and dental apparatus and instruments, namely, flexible, semi-flexible and rigid endoscopes, cameras and video cameras for use in medical endoscopes, surgical staplers, cartridge for surgical staplers, vertebrae for distal tips of flexible endoscopes and back-office units for endoscopy namely pumps for insufflation and suction, light source and ultrasound sight, and veterinary apparatus and instruments namely, flexible, semi-flexible and rigid endoscopes, cameras and video cameras for use in the medical endoscopes, surgical staplers, cartridge for surgical staplers, vertebrae for distal tips of flexible endoscopes and back-office units for endoscopy namely, pumps for insufflation and suction, light source and ultrasound sight | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | Installation and maintenance of endoscopy systems | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |