USPTO serial 76622266
SHS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harold V. Stotland
HAROLD V STOTLAND SEYFARTH SHAW LLPSTE 4200, 55 E MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60603-5803UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cooling apparatus for use in computers; heat transfer apparatus for use in computers; thermal diffusion apparatus for use in computers; cooling apparatus for use in communication apparatus; heat transfer apparatus for use in communication apparatus; thermal diffusion apparatus for use in communication apparatus; cooling apparatus for use in electronic equipment; heat transfer apparatus for use in electronic equipment; thermal diffusion apparatus for use in electronic equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | refrigerating machines; cooling evaporators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |