Drawing for COLOR THERAPY

USPTO serial 76635742

COLOR THERAPY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLOR THERAPY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

MYRON AMER MYRON AMER PC114 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 310MINEOLA, NY 11501-4410UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003SHAMPOO FOR NATURAL BLOND, BRUNETTE AND RED HAIRACTIVEDec 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 21, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 21, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 5, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 8, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 8, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 8, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 17, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 16, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance