USPTO serial 76649301
INTERTRADE CATALOGUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERTRADE CATALOGUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Laval (Quebec), CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. YATES DOWELL, III
A YATES DOWELL III DOWELL & DOWELL PC2111 EISENHOWER AVE STE 406ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-4679UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER APPLICATION SOFTWARE THAT ENABLES TRADING PARTNERS IN A BUSINESS COMMUNITY TO UPLOAD, VIEW, MODIFY AND MANAGE THEIR PRODUCT INFORMATION IN A CENTRAL DATA REPOSITORY EITHER DEPLOYED WITHIN THE CORPORATE IT INFRASTRUCTURE OR HOSTED IN APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER MODE, SO THE PRODUCT INFORMATION CAN BE VIEWED, MODIFIED, MANAGED AND DOWNLOADED BY OTHER TRADING PARTNERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING NON-DOWNLOADABLE APPLICATIONS THAT ENABLE TRADING PARTNERS IN A BUSINESS COMMUNITY TO UPLOAD, VIEW, MODIFY AND MANAGE THEIR PRODUCT INFORMATION IN A CENTRAL DATA REPOSITORY EITHER DEPLOYED WITHIN THE CORPORATE IT INFRASTRUCTURE OR HOSTED IN APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER MODE, SO THE PRODUCT INFORMATION CAN BE VIEWED, MODIFIED, MANAGED AND DOWNLOADED BY OTHER TRADING PARTNERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |