USPTO serial 76649616
ENABLING EBUSINESS CONVERSATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENABLING EBUSINESS CONVERSATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Laval (Quebec), CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. YATES DOWELL, III
A. YATES DOWELL, III Dowell & Dowell, P.C.103 Oronoco St.Suite 220Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE USED TO ENABLE E-COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS, COMPUTERIZED DATE INTERCHANGE AND EXCHANGE, DATA STORAGE AND SYSTEMS INTEGRATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, ENABLING COMPUTERIZED BUSINESS CONVERSATIONS THROUGH APPLICATIONS EMBEDDED IN THE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE AND IMPLEMENTED WITHIN THE CORPORATE WAN (WIDE AREA NETWORK) TO ENABLE E-COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS, COMPUTERIZED DATA INTERCHANGE, EXCHANGE, STORAGE AND SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; PROVIDING COMPUTER DATA CENTER FACILITIES FEATURING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE TO ENABLE E-COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS, COMPUTERIZED DATA INTERCHANGE, EXCHANGE, STORAGE AND SYSTEMS INTEGRATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |