USPTO serial 76649617
EBUSINESS CONVERSATION MANAGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EBUSINESS CONVERSATION MANAGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Laval (Quebec), CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. YATES DOWELL, III
A. YATES DOWELL, III Dowell & Dowell, P.C.103 Oronoco St.Suite 220Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING A WEB SITE TO TRADING PARTNER MANAGERS AND BUSINESS USERS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR EBUSINESS CONVERSATIONS WITH TRADING PARTNERS WHERE THEY CAN VIEW, CONFIGURE AND MANAGE SERVICES, NAMELY, VIEWING THE STATE AND CONTENT OF ELECTRONIC EXCHANGES OF MESSAGES, FILES AND DOCUMENTS, AS WELL AS CONFIGURING AND MANAGING THE SERVICE TO MEET THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS OF BUSINESS RULES OR PROCESSES AS THEY ARE DEFINED AND REDEFINED | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE WEB BASED SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF WEB BASED APPLICATIONS THAT PROVIDE VIEW, CONFIGURATION AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, VIEWING THE STATE AND CONTENT OF ELECTRONIC EXCHANGES OF MESSAGES, FILES AND DOCUMENTS, AS WELL AS CONFIGURING AND MANAGING THE SERVICE TO MEET THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS OF BUSINESS RULES OR PROCESSES AS THEY ARE DEFINED AND REDEFINED TO TRADING PARTNER MANAGERS AND BUSINESS USERS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR EBUSINESS CONVERSATIONS WITH TRADING PARTNERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |