USPTO serial 76661293
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheldon S. Lazarovitz
SHELDON S LAZAROVITZ31 WESTGATE BLVDTORONTO, ON M3H 1N8CANADACopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |