Drawing for TREEHUGGER

USPTO serial 76661293

TREEHUGGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TREEHUGGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sheldon S. Lazarovitz

SHELDON S LAZAROVITZ31 WESTGATE BLVDTORONTO, ON M3H 1N8CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029milk, organic milk, yogurt, cheese, tofuACTIVE—
030ice cream, organic ice creamACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 15, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 8, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 5, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 4, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2011CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 2, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 27, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 26, 2010CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 26, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2009CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 29, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 29, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 26, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 25, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 25, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2008CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 10, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 2, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 21, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 20, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 12, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2007CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 8, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 5, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 2, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 2, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance