Drawing for SILK OBSESSION

USPTO serial 76661645

SILK OBSESSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, KATHERINE S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILK OBSESSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

MYRON AMER MYRON AMER PC114 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 310MINEOLA, NY 11501-4410UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003A HAIR DETANGLERACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 29, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 29, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 23, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 20, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 20, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 30, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 21, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance