USPTO serial 76664686
BAUER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 9, 2010
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with BAUER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
86529 Schrobenhausen, DE
Schrobenhausen, DE
Schrobenhausen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Ervin
David J. Ervin CROWELL & MORING LLPP.O. Box 14300WASHINGTON, DC 20044-4300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Construction machines, namely, pile drilling systems comprised of carriage, mast, slide, drive, auger, and cutting teeth, trench cutters, backhoes, cranes, and graders; Drilling machines for civil engineering and parts therefor, namely, casing tubes, boring rods, pipe and rod couplings, drilling tools; subterraneous curtain cutting machines, subterraneous curtain gripping machines; vibrating machines for making drill holes and for compressing earth and building material, in particular deep-bed vibrating machines; Support apparatus for subterraneous curtain cutting machines, deep-well vibrating apparatus and deep-well compressors machines, namely, universal pile drivers, top vibrators for making drill holes and for compressing earth and building material, leader rigs in the nature of hydraulic excavators for carrying drill tools and drilling apparatus, pile driving rigs; Pressing tools, namely, fodder presses, hydraulic presses and metal extrusion presses; Drawing tools, namely, power-operated tube extractors and tube breaking devices; Pneumatic and hydraulic presses and pumps for use as parts of construction machines; Mechanical mixing machines for suspensions, injection and sealing compositions; Deep soil mixing machines, displacement drilling machines, fly drills in the nature of top drilling machines, capsule presses for piles in the nature of hydraulic presses; Mixed-in-place devices, namely, machine tools in the nature of cutting-mixing heads for cutting drill holes and mixing suspensions, injection, and sealing compositions, CSM rigs for cutting drill holes and mixing suspensions; Multiple screw drilling machines; Devices for jet blast processes in the nature of high pressure injectors; Carrier devices in the nature of hydraulic carriers for carrying drilling apparatus and drilling machines, pile drivers, leader rigs for carrying drilling tools and drilling apparatus; Injection machines for injecting suspensions and sealing compositions, CSV devices in the nature of injection machines for injecting suspensions and sealing compositions, drilling rigs for anchorages and injections, machines and apparatus used for drilling with the CSV method, comprised of carriage, mast, slide, drive, and auger slides; Displacement drilling machines; Construction components in the nature of rotary drilling tools, wear parts for drilling tools, casing oscillators, drill heads, hydraulic drifters, rotary heads for anchor rigs, rotary heads for pile rigs, front-of-the-wall drilling rigs, double head drilling rigs, hydraulic chucks, drilling tubes for rotary, rotary percussion, overburden and double head drilling, drill bits, flushing heads, crane jibs for drill tube handling, tube racks; Repress devices in the nature of grouting plants, tube extractors and tube breaking devices; power operated devices to pick up soil samples in the nature of grab systems comprised of carriage, boom, rope, drive, and grab unit, hydraulic diaphragm wall grabs in the nature of grabs for excavating soil, hydraulic pile grabs in the nature of pile grabs for excavating soil, grab-rotating devices in the nature of trench cutters | ACTIVE | Jan 19, 1979 |
| 009 | Pile clinometers; Optical frequency metrology devices; load cells | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1998 |
| 040 | Deep ranging soil improvement in the nature of soil treatment services | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 1986 |
| 042 | Civil engineering, namely, special-purpose civil engineering, structural engineering, consultation in the field of geothermal sciences in underground construction products | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BAUER AG
- Other trademarks owned by BAUER AG
- Other trademarks owned by BAUER AG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BAUER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 7, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 2, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 16, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |