USPTO serial 76667986
HYDROPOST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HYDROPOST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | HYDROSEEDING MULCH | ACTIVE | Jun 4, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |