Drawing for GET PHENOM

USPTO serial 76680907

GET PHENOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GET PHENOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberley G. Nobles,

KIMBERLEY G. NOBLES, CROWELL & MORING LLPPO BOX 14300WASHINGTON, DC 20044-4300UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for use in providing secure and non secure communication over wireless local area networks, Local Area Networks, Wide Area Networks, peer group networks and other computer networks; computer hardware and software for use in providing secure e-mail, chats, file transfers, downloads, and remote access; computer hardware and software for use in providing an application protocol interface that supports voice over internet protocol, white boarding, and video voice conferencingACTIVE—
042Computer software design for others; computer network design for others; computer programming for others; design and development of online computer software systems; computer security services, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media, individuals, and facilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 1, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 29, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 29, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 29, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 28, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 28, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 31, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 27, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance