USPTO serial 76681953
DOVETAIL ORGANIZER YOUR DIGITAL SAFETY DEPOSIT BOX.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DOVETAIL ORGANIZER YOUR DIGITAL SAFETY DEPOSIT BOX.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary L. Shaffer
Gary L. Shaffer Gary L. Shaffer, Esq. LLC901 BANKS PLALEXANDRIA, VA 22312-5507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PERSONAL INFORMATION AND DOCUMENT STORAGE AND ORGANIZATIONAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, PRE-RECORDED SOFTWARE IN THE FORM OF COMPACT DISCS, AND WEB BASED AND INTERNET DOWNLOADS CONTAINING SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS FOR THE SECURE STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL OF AN INDIVIDUAL PERSONAL AND LEGAL INFORMATION AND RELATED DOCUMENTS | ACTIVE | Apr 18, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |