USPTO serial 76683382
ANTHOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANTHOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claudia Cantarella
Claudia Cantarella SalansRockefeller Center, 620 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Bedding and accessories, namely, bedding sets comprising comforters and bed sheets; comforters, bed sheets, duvets, duvet covers, quilts, bed linens, bed spreads, bed skirts, bed shams, dust ruffles, bed blankets, bed pads, throws, pillow cases, pillow covers, decorative pillow covers, pillow shams, mattress pads, mattress toppers, mattress covers, bed canopies, fabric valances, curtain tiebacks; bedding for infants, namely, comforters, crib bumpers, crib sheets, crib dust ruffles, crib blankets, receiving blankets, and sheet protectors, namely, mattress pads for the purpose of inhibiting or preventing fluid transfer between bedding layers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LF USA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LNT Merchandising Company, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LNT Merchandising Company, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named ANTHOLOGY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 31, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |