CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ONLY1

USPTO serial 76689160

ONLY1

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONLY1?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan S. Weinstein

JORDAN S. WEINSTEIN OBLON, SPIVAK, McCLELLAND, MAIER1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cellular telephones; prepaid cellular telephones; magnetically encoded cards, namely, telephone calling cards and prepaid telephone calling cards; wireless cards, namely, top-up cards for cellular telephonesACTIVE—
035Customer loyalty services for promotional purposes, namely, provision of loyalty accounts where purchasers of certain products are rewarded with additional telephone airtimeACTIVE—
036Mobile money transfer services from phone to phone, phone to card, card to phone, or phone to another person's cardACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 2, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 1, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 1, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 17, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 29, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 18, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 5, 2009DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 3, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 2, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2009DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 27, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance