Drawing for THUMBPRINT DELIGHTS

USPTO serial 76690407

THUMBPRINT DELIGHTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THUMBPRINT DELIGHTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

MYRON AMER Myron Amer, P.C.350 NATIONAL BLVD STE 2BLONG BEACH, NY 11561-3327UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030In the thumbprint cookie category, and not including a taste benefitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 10, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 10, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 22, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 22, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 24, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 11, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 9, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 13, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance