USPTO serial 76690810
KWIKLIFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KWIKLIFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A. Rolston
GEORGE A. ROLSTON GEORGE ROLSTON & ASSOCIATES45 SHEPPARD AVENUE EASTSUITE 900TORONTO, ON M2N 5W9Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | HARD WINDOW COVERINGS, NAMELY, NON METAL SHUTTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2010 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2010 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 4, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |