CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MUU

USPTO serial 76691570

MUU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Wayne Pritchard

R. WAYNE PRITCHARD R. Wayne Pritchard, P.C.300 E MAIN DR STE 1240EL PASO, TX 79901-1359UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Dairy Products and Dairy By-Products, namely, milk and yogurtACTIVE—
030Frozen yogurtACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2010PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Jun 25, 2010APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 21, 2010PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 23, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 23, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 5, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 5, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 5, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 4, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 4, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 31, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance