Drawing for INSPIRED SOLUTIONS... FOR THE WAY YOU LIVE

USPTO serial 76691733

INSPIRED SOLUTIONS... FOR THE WAY YOU LIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSPIRED SOLUTIONS... FOR THE WAY YOU LIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George A. Rolston

GEORGE A. ROLSTON GEORGE ROLSTON & ASSOCIATES45 SHEPPARD AVE EAST, SUITE 900TORONTO ONTARIO, M2N 5W9CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019HARD WINDOW COVERINGS, NAMELY, NON-METAL SHUTTERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 11, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 27, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 14, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 13, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2010PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 3, 2009PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 12, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 14, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 6, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance