USPTO serial 76692151
INTEGRATED ENERGY DELIVERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 15, 2010
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with INTEGRATED ENERGY DELIVERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence G. Fridman
Lawrence G. Fridman FEIGIN & FRIDMAN, LLC1037 ROUTE 46 EAST, Suite 107CLIFTON, NJ 07013-2459UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial drying and curing systems comprised of drying and curing machines with lines for applying coatings to a wide variety of goods, belt conveyors, processing controls, sensors utilizing [ ultra-violet and ] infra-red radiation sources of thermal energy and components parts of drying and curing systems in the nature of heaters, preheaters, hot air plenums and nozzles; Industrial drying and curing machines with lines for applying coatings to a wide variety of goods | ACTIVE | Apr 20, 1987 |
| 011 | Industrial drying and curing systems, namely, drying ovens, curing ovens, [ and ultra-violet curing lamps; ] and component parts therefor including controls [ and sensors ] utilizing [ ultra-violet and ] infra-red radiation sources and thermal energy | ACTIVE | Apr 20, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GLENRO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GLENRO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GLENRO, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named INTEGRATED ENERGY DELIVERY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 10, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 10, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |