Drawing for DOUBLE-LOK

USPTO serial 76693637

DOUBLE-LOK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOUBLE-LOK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kay Lyn Schwartz

KAY LYN SCHWARTZ GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1601 ELM ST3000 THANKSGIVING SQ IP SECTIONDALLAS, TX 75201-4761

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Standing seam metal roof deck panelACTIVEMay 25, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 10, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 9, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 9, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 24, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 1, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 29, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 9, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 9, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 28, 2011RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Mar 28, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 3, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 3, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 24, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 19, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 12, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 25, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 4, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 28, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 1, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 23, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance