USPTO serial 76696486
FEETPOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3812264Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 29, 2010
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FEETPOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ROCKVILLE, MD
ROCKVILLE, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James G. O'Boyle
JAMES G. O'BOYLE Brady, O'Boyle & Gates5530 WISCONSIN AVE STE 711CHEVY CHASE, MD 20815-4388UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Flower Pots | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 25, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |