Drawing for XIPHOS

USPTO serial 76696530

XIPHOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XIPHOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Justin M. Welch

Justin M. Welch Blazier Christensen Bigelow & Virr PC221 West 6th Street, Suite 2000Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Spinal implants composed of artificial materialACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 6, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2011PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Dec 1, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 23, 2011PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 21, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 20, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 18, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 10, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 12, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 11, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 9, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2010PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Jun 25, 2010APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 24, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2010PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 3, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 11, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 22, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 6, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 6, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 4, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 4, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 25, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 1, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance