USPTO serial 76697266
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ezra Sutton
EZRA SUTTON LAW OFFICES OF EZRA SUTTON, P.A.PLAZA 9 BLDG 900 U S HWY 9WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, BATHING SUITS, SWIMWEAR, SWIM DRESSES, COVER DRESSES, TOPS, AND BOARD SHORTS; AND BODYWEAR, NAMELY, TIGHTS, BODYSUITS, LEOTARDS, BIKE SHORTS, BRA TOPS, LEGGINGS, BIKETARDS, UNITARDS, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATPANTS, TANK TOPS, SHORTS, JOGGING SUITS, ATHLETIC SHOES, SOCKS, HATS, HEADBANDS, AND UNDERWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |