USPTO serial 76702057
DATASHARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4408679Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 24, 2013
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DATASHARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Monroeville, PA
Monroeville, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ansel M. Schwartz
ANSEL M SCHWARTZONE STERLING PLAZA201 N CRAIG STREET SUITE 304PITTSBURGH, PA 15213Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software application for data conferencing that allows conferees of an audio or video conference to share data from their computer to any other conferee's computer in the audio or video conference | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 7, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 16, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |