USPTO serial 76702429
GOURMET TODAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOURMET TODAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric E. Gisolfi
Eric E. Gisolfi Sabin, Bemant & Gould, LLPFour Times Square, 23rd FloorNEW YORK, NY 10036-6518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Chef knives, flatware, forks, spoons, knives, mandolins and non-electric peelers | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Measuring cups | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Cookware, namely, anodized steel, stainless steel, cast iron pots and pans; bakeware, namely, cake pans, pie dish, muffin pans, sheet pans, cookie sheets; household utensils, namely, whisks, serving spoons, spatulas, mixing bowls, colanders, cutting boards, graters, utensils for barbeques, namely, forks, tongs, turners; stemware, namely, wineglasses, glassware, specialty cocktail glasses, decanters, bar glasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Prepared food kits composed of meat, poultry, fish, seafood, and/or vegetables and also including sauces or seasonings, ready for cooking and assembly as a meal; frozen, frosted, preserved, processed, dried, cooked or crystallized fruit and vegetables extracts for use in prepared meals or food | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing cooking classes and cooking schools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Advance Magazine Publishers Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Advance Magazine Publishers Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named GOURMET TODAY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 9, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 17, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |