USPTO serial 76706272
BOSCIA HOT BLACK CLEANSING GEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOSCIA HOT BLACK CLEANSING GEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yasuo Muramatsu
YASUO MURAMATSU MURAMATSU & ASSOCIATES114 PACIFICA STE 310IRVINE, CA 92618-3329UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Creams, namely, cleansing creams, cold creams, foundation creams, hand creams, sunburn creams, eye creams, lip creams; Skin care and bath products, namely, sun block lotions and sprays, sunscreen lotions and sprays, self-tanning lotions and sprays, moisturizing lotions and sprays, after-sun lotions and sprays, body mask lotions and sprays, skin lotions and sprays, skin refiners, pore mattifiers, hair lotions and sprays, facial lotions and sprays, body lotions and sprays, moisturizers and toners, tinted moisturizers, after-bath lotions and sprays, cosmetic masks, body masks, skin masks, skin moisturizer masks, facial masks, beauty masks, facial beauty masks, pore strips, pore cleaning strips, pore minimizing strips, pore treatment strips | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 20, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |