USPTO serial 76708031
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Crystal Mountain, WA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas R. Gunn
Nicholas R Gunn IRONMARK LAW GROUP, PLLC2311 N 45TH ST STE 365SEATTLE, WA 98103-6905UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Apparel, namely, shirts, sweatshirts, sweaters, hats | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2005 |
| 041 | Providing recreational sports facilities in Washington State, namely, ski resorts, ski and snowboard instruction, arranging and conducting sporting contests and exhibitions, namely, ski and snowboard races and exhibitions, rental of sporting equipment, namely, skis, snowboards, and related accessories; providing entertainment facilities in the nature of facilities for live music, sports competition facilities, and amusement facilities | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2005 |
| 043 | Hotel, restaurant, and catering services | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |