USPTO serial 76709389
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Riebling
Peter J. Riebling Riebling IP, PLLC1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Suite 1025Washington, DC 20006-3951| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | HARD WINDOW COVERINGS, NAMELY, NON METAL SHUTTERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 30, 2015 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |