Drawing for VENUS SMILE

USPTO serial 76710007

VENUS SMILE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VENUS SMILE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nathaniel Kramer

NATHANIEL KRAMER KIRSCHSTEIN, OTTINGER, ISRAEL & SCHIFFM5TH FL425 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-2223

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Toothpaste and mouth washACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2015PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 12, 2015PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 12, 2015APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 10, 2014PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 3, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 2, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 29, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 4, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 26, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 15, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 25, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 16, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 16, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance